Best tour operator software: Tour Booking Software Pricing

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

9 of the 31 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 22 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 0 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 201 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the total cost of ownership per vendor at a stated booking volume, which nobody publishes: every vendor advertises EITHER a monthly subscription OR a per-booking percentage OR both, and the estate's index normalises them onto one axis - cost per 100 bookings at a stated average order value, and the crossover volume at which a subscription beats a commission.

Beside it: the median, minimum and maximum advertised entry price across every vendor that publishes one; the share publishing a price at all versus quote-only (measured, not asserted - FareHarbor, Peek Pro and Ventrata publish nothing on their own sites); who charges the customer versus the operator; and repriced-since the previous read, which is the news when a vendor moves its booking fee.

201 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.